On the drive back from the Metroplex, I was -- unfortunately -- forced to listen to AM radio for a brief interlude.
Seems like the firing of several US Attorney -- nine, I think -- is the latest scandal flag being lustily waved by the Democrats.
Am I the only person who remembers co-Presidents Bill and Hillary Clinton firing ALL US Attorneys by way of Janet Reno in 1993?
So -- will somebody, anybody, please tell me why it's okay for President Clinton/Janet Reno to fire 93 or 94 US Attorneys, yet a massive scandal for President Bush/Alberto Gonzales to fire eight US Attorneys?
Is it because Bush didn't fire enough? If he'd gone ahead and fired every-bloody-one -- like Clinton did -- would that have been okay?
And I'm here to tell you, Senator Clinton -- who was, if I remember correctly, something called a "Co-President" when every working U.S. Attorney was fired by the White House in 1993 -- just might ought to keep her hypocritical mouth shut on the subject of firing US Attorneys.
But that's just me.